Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clumping (computer science)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to State space (dynamical system). Courcelles 15:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Clumping (computer science) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced, one-sentence definition unlikely ever to grow beyond a dictionary definition. Pnm (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to State space (dynamical system) -- Whpq (talk) 17:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect, as Whpq.
- I've also undone a recent GF edit which changed the whole topic to one about MacOS filesystems. That's a worthy redirect too (to something bigger on MacOS filesystems), but it should stay separate. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge seems reasonable to me. Should I withdraw the nomination or wait? --Pnm (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If you agree with the merge suggestion, then there's no real need to wait. Nobody is advocating deletion. If an admin feels it should remain open, they can leave it open. -- Whpq (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merged, thanks. --Pnm (talk) 01:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If you agree with the merge suggestion, then there's no real need to wait. Nobody is advocating deletion. If an admin feels it should remain open, they can leave it open. -- Whpq (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge seems reasonable to me. Should I withdraw the nomination or wait? --Pnm (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn by nominator. --Pnm (talk) 01:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.