Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blatant Disarray (EP)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant Disarray (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM, having no sources at all, and no reliable sources found online, just the usual non-RS sites for metal bands such as Spirit of Metal and Metal Archives. All the articles related to the band were recently created by a SPA and have borderline notability, but this fails outright without any sources. Redirect not really an option as the EP name is the same as the band. Richard3120 (talk) 15:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to a lack of coverage in third-party, reliable sources. I agree that a redirect would probably be quite silly as a person who starts to enter the title into the search bar would easily be able to find the article on the band before they type out the (EP) part. Aoba47 (talk) 15:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article clearly fails the notability test for albums but also general notability. There just isn't anything here to make an encyclopedia article out of.Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.