Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements/Endorsements/Improv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Hello all, glad to see that I finally have endorsements and disendorsements to talk about (my section was getting very lonely). I would be happy to talk about any disendorsements I have recieved. See User:Improv/arbcom_disendorsements for details (and feel free to edit that page within normal bounds of courtesy) --Improv 21:08, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Support

  • Support --jni 13:51, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support Nelson Ricardo 08:04, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
  • Weak support. What little I've seen of Improv bodes well, but alas as of now it is little. VeryVerily 22:59, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Strongly oppose. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 02:31, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. A trail of bias without the balance and fairness required for an AC. HistoryBuffEr 01:33, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
  • Oppose; user has a record of radical deletionism that makes me uncomfortable. Everyking 06:54, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Seems to have a history of bias. Factitious 10:05, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose: Has an evidentiary history of bias. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 23:59, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)