Jump to content

User:Prrl201/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Social Class Ladder

The Social Class Ladder is a conceptual framework that is commonly used in sociology which illustrates the hierarchical or class rankings between individuals or groups[1][2]. Social class ladder focus on the potential movement between classes including upward and downward of classes[3][4] while social class only rank according to economic status, culture attribution and social status[5][6]. Historically, the idea of social class ladder has developed from rigid and ascribed hierarchies such as feudal and caste system to a more fluid and complex system which evolute along with the industrialization and capitalist economies[7]. Two major influential theorists shape the concept. One of the major theorists is Karl Marx, he reveals that economic relationships and class conflict have been underlined as crucial in motivating social change. On the other hand, Max Weber provided a multidimensional perspective on economic criteria, power and social status[8][9].

In many of the Western countries, it is often regarded as a reflection of the opportunity for upward mobility that is contingent upon personal achievement[10]. In contract, more rigid structured systems like South Asian caste system, it highlights structural barriers[11]. Although social class ladder oversimplifies social dynamics and overlooks the complexity of intersectionality , this ladder has remained an important tool for analyzing inequality and social mobility[12][13].

Historical Context

Origins

The concept of social class ladder has its roots in the enduring hierarchical systems that have organized human societies from ancient times to the medieval period[14]. Early social class structures always falsified or maintained by the tradition, law and religion which didnt leave any chance for mobility[15]. In many ancient civilizations, such as Mesopotamia and dynastic China, social class ladder was linked to hereditary lineage, professional guilds, or religious castes. Upper class own the highest tier of the social power[16]. Similar occasions appeared throughout much of the premodern world including medieval Europe’s feudal system[17]. Under the system of feudal, aristocrats and clergy had the priority to access in land, power and education. However, people like peasants and serfs must take part in agricultural labor as they didn't have any other pathways to rise their social class[18]. While caste system in South Asia established another model of social stratification, which not only limited the social status and the career options from birth, but also restricted cross-caste interaction and marriage[19].

Along with the sociological thought appeared in 19th century, the knowledge based with better systematic and understanding emerged[20]. This attributed to three influences theorists Karl Marx, Max Weber. Karl Marx put class conflict in the first place of historical development while responding to the ravages of the Industrial Revolution. He revealed the society is divided into two classes under capitalism. The two classes are bourgeoisie-who owned power of production; and proletariat-who sold their labor in order to survive. According to Karl Marx, the social order was reshaped due to the fundamental tensions produced by the economic relationship[21][22]. While Karl Marx focused on material conditions, Max Weber introduced a new approach with more dimensions to stratification. He merged economic class with social status and political influence. He recognized that class is not only a single category but an aspect of a wider hierarchy which this hierarchy included social prestige and the ability to take control of the power in political and organizational means[23][24].

Evolution

Along with the industrialization and the emergence of capitalist economies, the transition from earlier, more rigid hierarchies to modern stratified systems started to accelerate. Some longstanding social barriers began to loosen as the production mode is conceded to factories, wage labor and the whole market[25]. The rapid growth of cities including the rising of the degree of education, economic and professional occupations create opportunities for upward mobility which this mobility was less affected by birth or traditions[26]. However, this new system did not eliminate inequality, this created a new class that is between bourgeoisie and proletariat. The class ladder became more complex[27].

Between late 20th century and 21st century, the measure of social class expanded to account the rise of post-industrial labor markets, services and the information economy and considered in a macro perspective about globalization’s impact on employment security and salary structure[28][29].

Theoretical Frameworks

Marxism

Karl Marx developed one of the earliest systematic theories of class but still a cornerstone of the understanding of social class ladder. He suggested that the social hierarchy is mainly due to the relationship between personal and the means of production. In capitalist economies, bourgeoisie owned factories, land and capital, however, proletariat exchanged their labor for wage[30]. Karl Marx indicated that this economic relationship caused inequality and social class conflicts sustainability as bourgeoisie gained by sacrificing proletariat's benefit. Eventually, the tension caused by capitalist economies which potentially lead to a revolutionary upheaval which changed the structure of social class. According to the theory, social class ladder was at a dynamic state. This dispute was shaped by the inequality and conflicts of interest between production and distribution[31].

Weberian Analysis

Max Weber introduced a more detailed, three-dimensional model about social stratification which is based on Karl Marx's theory on economically grounded vision. He revealed that the understanding of social class is insufficient if only consider market position but lack of the consideration about social status and the power of organizational and political. Individuals with the same economic level may have different degrees of social respect and political power. Social class ladder included different hierarchies. It caused social mobility and social stability to become problems of wealth, culture recognition and political[32][33].

Cultural Capital and Class Reproduction

Pierre Bourdieu focused on a narrower level of cultural mechanisms that enable social classes to maintain their existence over time. He suggested the concept of cultural capital—knowledge, education and behavior and social capital—sense of belonging and social ties. Social class ladder maintained through stable relationship and cultural competencies not only power or economic status, this helped in transfer power to next generation and maintain the exist of social class ladder[34].

Components and level of the Social Class Ladder

Defining Features

Economic Factors

Income and Occupation

One of the key components of social class position is individuals' economic status—salary, wages, profits and investments. Different occupations have different income. High-income professional or management often provide a platform for moving up the social class ladder; however, low-income or unstable income occupation may limit the upward mobility[35].

Wealth and Assets

Beside income, accumulated wealth such as savings, properties and investment provide a long term assure. This wealth can reduce the impact caused by economic expansion and provide resources for education, business investment and buying a property. This wealth always allows families to remain on the upper class of the ladder and stay in elite status[36].

Occupational Status and Labor Conditions

The nature of occupation is a signal of social class position. Manual laborers always represent lower class or working class, professional or administrators always represent middle or upper class. Professional licenses or stable job may influence the social mobility[37].

Access to Economic Opportunities

Market trends, technology advancements, and globalization affect access to profitable industries and markets. Individual's social class is linked to their ability to adjust to changing job needs, invest in skill-building, and handle economic challenges[38].

Cultural and Educational Resources

Cultural capital

Social class ladder is not only considering economic status. Cultural preferences, language usage, educational qualifications, and knowledge of prestigious institutions can indicate belonging to an upper class and facilitate access to powerful networks[39].

Social Networks and Relationships

Who you know can be as important as what you know or own. Personal connections to influential individuals, mentors, or professional associations may gain you job referrals, investment opportunities, or access to exclusive social circles[40].

Prestige and Honor

Some job titles, associations with reputable institutions, or memberships to prestigious communities and clubs are prestige titles. Such non-economic recognition has an impact on the ability to obtain social recognition, leadership and trust from the public[41].

Political and Organizational Power

Class position can also be determined by one’s influence within political, corporate or nonprofit institutions. Those that can influence policy decisions, business strategies, or organizational priorities are often higher up the social class ladder[42].

Levels of the Ladder

File:DALL·E 2024-12-15 09.09.05 - A minimalistic and clean illustration of a vertical ladder with only four rungs, each labeled clearly as 'Lower Class,' 'Working Class,' 'Middle Class.webp

Lower class

Individuals in lower class have economic fragility, low levels of education and unstable income jobs. This condition influence the upward mobility. They need to due with systemic challenges such as lack of access to quality schools or professional networks to move to higher classes[43].

Working class

Individuals in the working class receive steady but modest wages, most of them engage in manual or service jobs. Although they have stable income, they require additional qualifications, training, or better use of social connections in order to rise to middle class. Understanding workplace communication and local professional networks may help them rise to higher classes[44].

Middle class

Individuals in middle class have stable and higher income, better education, and cultural advantages which assist them maintain in middle class. Some can rise to higher social classes through financial management, career growth, and building valuable connections. They frequently act as a link between the rich and the poor which they work to provide comfort and opportunities for their families[45].

Upper class

Individuals in upper class hold the top positions in society. They have significant resources, superior education, and powerful connections with the power to shape public policy and markets. They seldom fear about their social class as their wealth and connections maintain in the top class. This stability can even redefine the definition of upper class[46].

Intersecting Influences and Contemporary Changes

Contemporary class analysis examines how race, ethnicity, gender, and other social identities interact with class. Modern globalization and technological advancements have reshaped the class structure, altering job markets, redistributing economic resources, and generating new forms of cultural and social capital[47].

Modern Perspectives

Globalization and Transnational Class Structures

Globalization has significantly transformed social class structures, extending them beyond national borders. With advancements in production, capital, and labor, wealthier individuals and nations typically occupy the highest positions in the global labor division[48]. Workers in low income regions often supply raw materials or engage in low-wage production, which cause them maintain at the bottom of this international hierarchy. This lead to inequality that disrupts conventional, nation-focused social class systems. This stratification emerges from intricate global networks related to trade, finance, and technology[49].

Technology, Automation, and the Gig Economy

New technologies such as robotics and artificial intelligence have reshaped job markets and social classes. Automation may result in the elimination of stable positions, limiting opportunities for advancement, while digital platforms typically promote gig work that offers little security, benefits, or career progression. This environment favors those with financial resources, technical skills, and entrepreneurial talent, enabling them to rise socially. In contrast, numerous workers endure precarious job situations, revealing a stark divide between those who successfully utilize technology and those left behind by rapid technological advancements[50][51].

Critiques of the Ladder Metaphor

Oversimplification of Complex Realities

Social class ladder provide a a straightforward concept from lower class to upper class. The relationship between classes have many aspects including race, gender, ethnicity, and geography. A single ladder cannot fulfil the relationship between multiple inequalities. This is an overlapping and complex relationship which individuals are hard to break through[52].

Assumption of Equal Opportunity

Social class ladder metaphor shows the opportunity for individuals to move to a higher class if they have skills and make the right choices even with different obstacles. This concept downplays barriers such as discriminate and the inequality on education. Structural reasons are limiting people's mobility for marginalized communities, while keeping systemic disadvantages dark[53].

Reinforcing a Singular Trajectory of Success

The ladder metaphor promotes an idea that upper mobility is always better than downward. Telling others that success and value can only be proved by climbing up the ladder. This logic may implicitly stigmatize to those who are in lower class or lower position as they are not in line with middle and upper class[54].

  1. ^ Kraus, Michael W.; Tan, Jacinth J. X.; Tannenbaum, Melanie B. (2013-04-01). "The Social Ladder: A Rank-Based Perspective on Social Class". Advancement of Psychological Theory. 24 (2): 81–96. doi:10.1080/1047840x.2013.778803. ISSN 1047-840X.
  2. ^ Kraus, Michael W; Park, Jun Won (2017-12-01). "The structural dynamics of social class". Current Opinion in Psychology. Inequality and social class. 18: 55–60. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.029. ISSN 2352-250X.
  3. ^ Jonsson, Frida; Sebastian, Miguel San; Hammarström, Anne; Gustafsson, Per E. (2017-01-03). "Intragenerational social mobility and functional somatic symptoms in a northern Swedish context: analyses of diagonal reference models". International Journal for Equity in Health. 16 (1): 1. doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0499-1. ISSN 1475-9276. PMC 5217297. PMID 28057005.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  4. ^ Goldthorpe, John H.; Jackson, Michelle (2007). "Intergenerational class mobility in contemporary Britain: political concerns and empirical findings". The British Journal of Sociology. 58 (4): 525–546. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00165.x. ISSN 1468-4446.
  5. ^ Erickson, Bonnie H. "Culture, Class, and Connections". American Journal of Sociology. 102 (1): 217–251. doi:10.1086/230912. ISSN 0002-9602.
  6. ^ Gordon, Milton M. "Social Class in American Sociology". American Journal of Sociology. 55 (3): 262–268. doi:10.1086/220535. ISSN 0002-9602.
  7. ^ Wallerstein, Immanuel. "The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 16 (4): 387–415. doi:10.1017/S0010417500007520. ISSN 1475-2999.
  8. ^ Gane, Nicholas (2005-05-01). "Max Weber as Social Theorist: 'Class, Status, Party'". European Journal of Social Theory. 8 (2): 211–226. doi:10.1177/1368431005051764. ISSN 1368-4310.
  9. ^ Robinson, Robert V.; Kelley, Jonathan (1979). "Class as Conceived by Marx and Dahrendorf: Effects on Income Inequality and Politics in the United States and Great Britain". American Sociological Review. 44 (1): 38–58. doi:10.2307/2094817. ISSN 0003-1224.
  10. ^ Bullock, Heather E.; Limbert, Wendy M. (2003). "Scaling the Socioeconomic Ladder: Low-Income Women's Perceptions of Class Status and Opportunity". Journal of Social Issues. 59 (4): 693–709. doi:10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00085.x. ISSN 1540-4560.
  11. ^ Mencher, Joan P. "The Caste System Upside Down, or The Not-So-Mysterious East". Current Anthropology. 15 (4): 469–493. doi:10.1086/201505. ISSN 0011-3204.
  12. ^ Choo, Hae Yeon; Ferree, Myra Marx (2010-06-01). "Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities". Sociological Theory. 28 (2): 129–149. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x. ISSN 0735-2751.
  13. ^ Blackburn, Robert M.; Prandy, Kenneth (1997-08-01). "The Reproduction of Social Inequality". Sociology. 31 (3): 491–509. doi:10.1177/0038038597031003007. ISSN 0038-0385.
  14. ^ Rousseau, Jérôme (1978-02-01). "On estates and castes". Dialectical Anthropology. 3 (1): 85–95. doi:10.1007/BF00257391. ISSN 1573-0786.
  15. ^ Yen, Hsueh-Cheng (2015), Hsu, Shihkuan; Wu, Yuh-Yin (eds.), "Education-Based Mobility and the Chinese Civilization", Education as Cultivation in Chinese Culture, Singapore: Springer, pp. 181–200, doi:10.1007/978-981-287-224-1_9, ISBN 978-981-287-224-1, retrieved 2024-12-15
  16. ^ Dien, Albert E. (1976-01-01). "Elite Lineages and the T'O-Pa Accommodation: a Study of the Edict of 495". Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. 19 (1): 61–88. doi:10.1163/156852076X00046. ISSN 1568-5209.
  17. ^ Hilton, Rodney H. (1974), Landsberger, Henry A. (ed.), "Peasant Society, Peasant Movements and Feudalism in Medieval Europe", Rural Protest: Peasant Movements and Social Change, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 67–94, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-01612-9_2, ISBN 978-1-349-01612-9, retrieved 2024-12-15
  18. ^ Bradley, H.; Taylor, M. (2009-01-01), Kitchin, Rob; Thrift, Nigel (eds.), "Feudalism and Feudal Society", International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 98–105, ISBN 978-0-08-044910-4, retrieved 2024-12-15
  19. ^ Berreman, Gerald D. "Caste in India and the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 66 (2): 120–127. doi:10.1086/222839. ISSN 0002-9602.
  20. ^ Swingewood, Alan (1991), Swingewood, Alan (ed.), "Origins of Sociology", A Short History of Sociological Thought, London: Macmillan Education UK, pp. 7–28, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-21642-0_1, ISBN 978-1-349-21642-0, retrieved 2024-12-15
  21. ^ Timofeev, Timur (1968-10-01). "Marx and working class development". Social Science Information. 7 (5): 37–49. doi:10.1177/053901846800700504. ISSN 0539-0184.
  22. ^ Fagen, Richard R. (1983-09-02). "Theories of Development: The Question of Class Struggle". Monthly Review. ISSN 0027-0520. Archived from the original on 2024-06-05.
  23. ^ Stone, John (2015), "Class, Status, and Party", The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 1–3, doi:10.1002/9781118663202.wberen682, ISBN 978-1-118-66320-2, retrieved 2024-12-15
  24. ^ Gane, Nicholas (2005-05-01). "Max Weber as Social Theorist: 'Class, Status, Party'". European Journal of Social Theory. 8 (2): 211–226. doi:10.1177/1368431005051764. ISSN 1368-4310.
  25. ^ Elsenhans, Hartmut (2019-10-02). "Rising mass incomes as a condition of capitalist growth. Preserving capitalism through the empowerment of labor in the past and the present". Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 42 (4): 554–589. doi:10.1080/01603477.2019.1672560. ISSN 0160-3477.
  26. ^ Crawford, Claire; Gregg, Paul; Macmillan, Lindsey; Vignoles, Anna; Wyness, Gill (2016). "Higher education, career opportunities, and intergenerational inequality". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 32 (4): 553–575. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grw030. ISSN 0266-903X. Archived from the original on 2022-09-01.
  27. ^ van der Kroef, Justus M. (1961-05-01). "Class Structure and Communist Theory". American Behavioral Scientist. 4 (9): 19–23. doi:10.1177/000276426100400906. ISSN 0002-7642.
  28. ^ Muntaner, Carles; Borrell, Carme; Vanroelen, Christophe; Chung, Haejoo; Benach, Joan; Kim, Il Ho; Ng, Edwin (2010-12-01). "Employment relations, social class and health: A review and analysis of conceptual and measurement alternatives". Social Science & Medicine. 71 (12): 2130–2140. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.038. ISSN 0277-9536.
  29. ^ Savage, Mike; Devine, Fiona; Cunningham, Niall; Taylor, Mark; Li, Yaojun; Hjellbrekke, Johs; Le Roux, Brigitte; Friedman, Sam; Miles, Andrew (2013-04-01). "A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC's Great British Class Survey Experiment". Sociology. 47 (2): 219–250. doi:10.1177/0038038513481128. ISSN 0038-0385.
  30. ^ Miller, Richard W. (1991), Carver, Terrell (ed.), "Social and political theory: Class, state, revolution", The Cambridge Companion to Marx, Cambridge Companions to Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–105, ISBN 978-0-521-36694-6, retrieved 2024-12-15
  31. ^ Avineri, Shlomo, ed. (1968), "The proletariat: the universal class", The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–64, ISBN 978-0-521-09619-5, retrieved 2024-12-15
  32. ^ Chan, Tak Wing; Goldthorpe, John H. (2007-08-01). "Class and Status: The Conceptual Distinction and its Empirical Relevance". American Sociological Review. 72 (4): 512–532. doi:10.1177/000312240707200402. ISSN 0003-1224.
  33. ^ Gane, Nicholas (2005-05-01). "Max Weber as Social Theorist: 'Class, Status, Party'". European Journal of Social Theory. 8 (2): 211–226. doi:10.1177/1368431005051764. ISSN 1368-4310.
  34. ^ Wacquant, Loïc (2002-12-01). "The Sociological Life of Pierre Bourdieu". International Sociology. 17 (4): 549–556. doi:10.1177/0268580902017004005. ISSN 0268-5809.
  35. ^ Andersson, Matthew A. (2018-04-01). "An Odd Ladder to Climb: Socioeconomic Differences Across Levels of Subjective Social Status". Social Indicators Research. 136 (2): 621–643. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1559-7. ISSN 1573-0921.
  36. ^ Nordli, Hansen, Marianne; Nicolay, Wiborg, Øyvind (2019-12-01). "The Accumulation and Transfers of Wealth: Variations by Social Class". European Sociological Review. 35 (6). doi:10.1093/e. ISSN 0266-7215. Archived from the original on 2024-08-09.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. ^ Goode, William J. "The Librarian: From Occupation to Profession?". The Library Quarterly. 31 (4): 306–320. doi:10.1086/618924. ISSN 0024-2519.
  38. ^ Brown, P.; Ashton, D.; Lauder, H.; Tholen, G. (2008). "Towards a high-skilled, low-waged workforce? A review of global trends in education, employment and the labour market". ESRC Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organisational Performance. ISSN 1466-1535.
  39. ^ Lareau, Annette (1987). "Social Class Differences in Family-School Relationships: The Importance of Cultural Capital". Sociology of Education. 60 (2): 73–85. doi:10.2307/2112583. ISSN 0038-0407.
  40. ^ Bartus, Tamás (2001). Social capital and earnings inequalities: The role of informal job search in Hungary. [S.l.]: s.n.
  41. ^ "Validate User". academic.oup.com. Retrieved 2024-12-15.
  42. ^ Laurison, Daniel (2016). "Social Class and Political Engagement in the United States". Sociology Compass. 10 (8): 684–697. doi:10.1111/soc4.12390. ISSN 1751-9020.
  43. ^ Kearney, Melissa S.; Levine, Phillip B. (2016). "Income Inequality, Social Mobility, and the Decision to Drop Out of High School". Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: 333–380. ISSN 0007-2303.
  44. ^ Zippay, Allison (2001-12-01). "The Role of Social Capital in Reclaiming Human Capital: A Longitudinal Study of Occupational Mobility among Displaced Steelworkers". The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare. 28 (4). doi:10.15453/0191-5096.2768. ISSN 0191-5096.
  45. ^ "Defining and Profiling the Middle Class". www.pids.gov.ph. Retrieved 2024-12-15.
  46. ^ Perotti, EnricoC.; vonThadden, Ernst Ludwig (2006). "The Political Economy of Corporate Control and Labor Rents". Journal of Political Economy. 114 (1): 145–175. doi:10.1086/500278. ISSN 0022-3808.
  47. ^ Flemmen, Magne; Jarness, Vegard; Rosenlund, Lennart (2018). "Social space and cultural class divisions: the forms of capital and contemporary lifestyle differentiation". The British Journal of Sociology. 69 (1): 124–153. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12295. ISSN 1468-4446.
  48. ^ Dancygier, Rafaela; Walter, Stefanie (2015), Beramendi, Pablo; Häusermann, Silja; Kitschelt, Herbert; Kriesi, Hanspeter (eds.), "Globalization, Labor Market Risks, and Class Cleavages", Dancygier, Rafaela; Walter, Stefanie (2015). Globalization, Labor Market Risks, and Class Cleavages. In: Beramendi, Pablo; Häusermann, Silja; Kitschelt, Herbert; Kriesi, Hanspeter. The politics of advanced capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 133-156., New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–156, ISBN 978-1-107-09986-9, retrieved 2024-12-15
  49. ^ The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology, and Environment. Archived from the original on 2024-11-15.
  50. ^ "The Impact of Robot and AI on Human Workforce – IJSREM". Retrieved 2024-12-15.
  51. ^ Ernst, Ekkehardt; Merola, Rossana; Samaan, Daniel (2019-08-14). "Economics of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Future of Work". IZA Journal of Labor Policy. 9 (1). doi:10.2478/izajolp-2019-0004.
  52. ^ Ore, Tracy (2022-03-07). "The Social Construction of Difference and Inequality". global.oup.com. Retrieved 2024-12-15.
  53. ^ Damyanov, Kaloyan (2024-10-08). "Inclusive Education and Social Inequality: An Anthropological Study of Social Mobility and Access to Education". International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM). 12 (10): 3719–3731. doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v12i10.el04. ISSN 2321-3418.
  54. ^ Kraus, Michael W.; Tan, Jacinth J. X.; Tannenbaum, Melanie B. (2013-04-01). "The Social Ladder: A Rank-Based Perspective on Social Class". Advancement of Psychological Theory. 24 (2): 81–96. doi:10.1080/1047840x.2013.778803. ISSN 1047-840X.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Prrl201/sandbox&oldid=1265306750"