Talk:Xerox Character Code Standard

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Translation

Note: this article is based on a rough translation of the French-language Wikipedia article fr:Xerox Character Code Standard. -- The Anome (talk) 13:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reflection

This codes should be edited to reflect Xerox Character Code Standard (XNIS 058405) code book, thus will be it purges this page. Rowan03 (talk) 19:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, another user will be purge page later, as stated above. Rowan03 (talk) 18:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode mismatches

Maybe I missed it but I can't find a mapping table or image for XCCS in the references. I've fixed some of the mismatches between the hex Unicode code point and the character displayed but without a good reference I can't figure out these:

Xerox character, hex Unicode code point vs character displayed
0x2131 U+205E ⁞ VERTICAL FOUR DOTS vs U+203E ‾ OVERLINE
0x2133 U+309D ゝ HIRAGANA ITERATION MARK vs U+30FD ヽ KATAKANA ITERATION MARK
0x2134 U+309E ゞ HIRAGANA VOICED ITERATION MARK vs U+30FE ヾ KATAKANA VOICED ITERATION MARK
0x2135 U+30FD ヽ KATAKANA ITERATION MARK vs U+309D ゝ HIRAGANA ITERATION MARK
0x2136 U+30FE ヾ KATAKANA VOICED ITERATION MARK vs U+309E ゞ HIRAGANA VOICED ITERATION MARK
0x213E U+2010 ‐ HYPHEN vs U+2013 – EN DASH
0x2169 U+2642 ♂ MALE SIGN vs U+2640 ♀ FEMALE SIGN
0x216A U+2640 ♀ FEMALE SIGN vs U+2642 ♂ MALE SIGN
0x2221 U+21C6 ⇆ LEFTWARDS ARROW OVER RIGHTWARDS ARROW vs U+25C6 ◆ BLACK DIAMOND
0x2275 U+2669 ♩ QUARTER NOTE vs U+266D ♭ MUSIC FLAT SIGN
0x2276 U+266A ♪ EIGHTH NOTE vs U+2669 ♩ QUARTER NOTE
0x245D U+307D ぽ HIRAGANA LETTER PO vs U+3071 ぱ HIRAGANA LETTER PA
0x2821 U+2500 ─ BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT HORIZONTAL vs U+2502 │ BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT VERTICAL (U+2500 is also used for 0xEFE5)
0x2822 U+2502 │ BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT VERTICAL vs U+2500 ─ BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT HORIZONTAL (U+2502 is also used for 0xEFE4)
0x2840 U+2543 ╃ BOX DRAWINGS LEFT UP HEAVY AND RIGHT DOWN LIGHT vs U+2542 ╂ BOX DRAWINGS VERTICAL HEAVY AND HORIZONTAL LIGHT
0x302B U+831C 茜 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-831C vs U+831B 茛 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-831B
0x302F U+6E25 渥 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-6E25 vs U+6E45 湅 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-6E45
0x3054 U+60DF 惟 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-60DF vs U+60BF 悿 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-60BF
0x305C U+79FB 移 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-79FB vs U+79BF 禿 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-79BF
0x3061 U+8D03 贃 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-8D03 vs U+8863 衣 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-8863
0x3062 U+8863 衣 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-8863 vs U+8B02 謂 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-8B02
0x3063 U+8B02 謂 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-8B02 vs U+9055 違 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-9055
0x3064 U+9055 違 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-9055 vs U+907A 遺 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-907A
0x3068 U+57DF 域 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-57DF vs U+80B2 育 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-80B2
0x3069 U+80B2 育 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-80B2 vs U+57DF 域 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-57DF
0x306B U+78EF 磯 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-78EF vs U+78BF 碿 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-78BF
0x3076 U+54ED 哭 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-54ED vs U+54BD 咽 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-54BD
0x3141 U+88B7 袷 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-88B7 vs U+834F 荏 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-834F (U+88B7 is also used for 0x3041)
0x3142 U+834F 荏 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-834F vs U+990C 餌 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-990C
0x315D U+689E 梞 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-689E vs U+698E 榎 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-698E
0x3167 U+6314 挔 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-6314 vs U+63F4 援 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-63F4
0xEF6F U+2238 ∸ DOT MINUS vs U+2235 ∵ BECAUSE (U+2268 is also used for 0x2235)

Additionally, these Xerox characters are currently mapped to Unicode letters. I think they should be mapped to similar looking symbols but I'm not sure:

0x0027 U+02BC ʼ MODIFIER LETTER APOSTROPHE
0x00C1 U+02CB ˋ MODIFIER LETTER GRAVE ACCENT
0x00C2 U+02CA ˊ MODIFIER LETTER ACUTE ACCENT
0x00C3 U+02C6 ˆ MODIFIER LETTER CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT
0x00CC U+02CD ˍ MODIFIER LETTER LOW MACRON
0x00CF U+02C7 ˇ CARON

Hopefully these mismatches can be resolved. DRMcCreedy (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]