The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Microsoft Windows: Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Characterisation of WOW

I wonder if WOW is a kind of virtualization or emulation or perhaps it works like WINE? Would be nice if someone could clarify that. -- John Ericson 18:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WOW is emulation non non-x86 NT systems (via NTVDM). On x86, it uses the Virtual 8086 mode of the CPU. This mode is unaccessible from x86-64 long mode, but modern systems are sufficiently fast enough that there is no reason that classic non-x86 NTVDM emulation could not be used. Segin (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Long filename

It should be noted that long filenames are not shortened in any way for 16-bit processes. Instead, NTFS stores a short filename for each long filename. The only difference from FAT12/16/32 with Long File Names is that the short 8.3 filename is optional. If a file entry does not contain an 8.3 short filename, then DOS and Windows 3.1 applications cannot access it. Segin (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WoW or WOW?

Is it really WOW? Why not WoW as in WoW64 (besides the clash with World of Warcraft)? It seems inconsistent. --Mortense (talk) 12:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mortense. I checked the sources at both articles. It seems WoW64 should be WOW64 according to the sources.

Best regards,

Codename Lisa (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WOW on Win9x?

Windows 98 comes with a file called "wow32.dll", which would appear to be WOW on win9x. In the article, though, it only says "[Win9x] could run 16-bit software natively without requiring any special emulation". More information about WOW on win9x would be nice.