Talk:Uniformization (set theory)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uniformization (set theory) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

need picture

This article could really use a picture like the one on page 33 of Moschovakis (1980). Anyone who's good at that sort of thing, please don't stand on ceremony. --Trovatore 18:19, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request has been fulfilled; removing template. --Trovatore 01:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

need rewording

So the note about uniformizations of relations in L(R) is really awkward at the moment. Maybe it should be a footnote? Just throwing it into the first sentence in the bullet above it, it seems to me, makes the thing kind of hard to follow. Not going to deal with it tonight. --Trovatore 05:21, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ZF or ZFC ?

"It follows from ZFC alone that ${\boldsymbol {\Pi }}_{1}^{1}$ and ${\boldsymbol {\Sigma }}_{2}^{1}$ have the uniformization property."

ZFC contains the axiom of choice, from which follows uniformization property for every set! 88.179.136.104 (talk) 08:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]