Talk:Timing diagram (Unified Modeling Language)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a computing diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots, or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

--- UML Timing Diagrams are very new.

I was expecting an article on digital electronic Timing Diagrams here, I am happy to write one.

Should it go here or somewhere else????

Mark

I would move this to UML Timing Diagram and create Digital electronic timing diagram and have this be a disambiguation page. —Ben FrantzDale 18:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. This page here is rather empty. However, what about Timing diagram (UML) for the new location of this page? --Ligulem 21:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this should be a disambiguation page. The current page contents should go to UML Timing Diagram and electronic timing diagrams should go to Digital Timing Diagram. I think the term 'UML Timing Diagram' is a commonly enough used term, and 'Digital Timing Diagram' is a more precise term than 'Electronic Timing Diagram'. --Dirkbike 19:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--- Where is the "collaboration diagram?" Geoffrey