The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Frankly, this is stupid. The Tenaka's hull design is signifigantly different to Tachek's. Whoever wrote this article doesn't know what they're talking about; they've decided that because the names start with the same letter, they're a ship's class.
I didn't write this-- but for some reason, despite your rather unpalatable way of presenting your argument, and not signing with four tildes-- I looked into this and agree that they sure look different. That and the fact that they were constructed quite a few years apart and have somewhat different specs, calls into question the credibility of the T-class. I'm marking this as unsourced, until someone finds out more. Thanks.--Keefer408:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
