Talk:Systems engineering process

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

MIL STD 499

My understanding is that MIL STD 499 is a systems engineering management standard, not an SE process definition. --Allan McInnes (talk) 04:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Early versions of 499 treated systems engineering management as a superset of systems engineering. The completed, but never signed 499B was primarily a practice standard. ComputerGeezer (talk) 21:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

figure 2?

In the paragraph 'Process Discription' 'figure 2' is referred to, but only fig.1 and fig.3 are visible

also figure 1 doesn't mean anything and figure3 is a broken link.--MarmotteiNoZ 10:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the file history, and on User_talk:E.Keegstra there's a note that User:Sfan00_IMG suspected there might be a copyright issue with the images and speedily deleted them -- 4 years after they were added (and long after User_talk:E.Keegstra gave up on Wikipedia.) Of course rather than editing the article to remove the links, the editor just left a trail of broken and misdirected links in now meaningless sentances. This is how we improve Wikipedia (and why the project has stagnated over the past few years...) 214.4.238.180 (talk) 20:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Software

Systems engineering is not software engineering, so explicit references to software in the Activities and Concepts chapters should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjmarques (talk • contribs) 14:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]