Jump to content

Talk:Succinct data structure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Who's this Jacobson fellow? Sketch-The-Fox 01:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it and removed the "underlying combinatorial object" jargon, which I think was confusing. When can we remove the note about the Jargon? Smhanov (talk) 02:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is a C String Really Implicit?

A C string uses a byte to encode a sequence of characters from a set of 255 alternatives, since the string can't contain 0 as a valid character. Therefore, a n+1 byte (8n+8 bit) C string will be encoding a data structure with entropy log(255)*n. Doesn't this mean that it's in fact a compact data structure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.252.105.234 (talk) 06:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is the heap the most known implicit data structure?

Wouldn't the simple array qualify for this position, even though it is a simpler data structure than the heap? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honeypot95 (talkcontribs) 14:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure Union-Find is compact: for every element Z, Union-Find just needs to maintain a parent pointer (and depending on optimizations, also a rank or size counter), making the overall size O(Z). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A621:3500:C543:DED7:72A2:64F3 (talk) 08:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

source of implicit vs succinct vs compact

what is the source for the definitions of implicit, succinct and compact? Is it "Jacobson, G. J (1988). Succinct static data structures (Ph.D. thesis)"? If so, shouldn't the ref be re-positioned to be after this part? Morinator (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]