Talk:Small matter of programming

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

My exposure with "SMOP" comes from the early 70s, and I'm more familiar with it being used to indicate that a feature/task is not conceptually complex, and the speaker believes that the person requesting the feature should simply sit down and write the code if it's all that important. Ie, it's not an indication that the effort required would be particularly great, but rather than the requesting party simply needs to do his own homework rather than asking someone else to do it or looking for a pre-packaged solution.drh (talk) 02:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That may be, but my own experience, as a programmer who has won multiple international awards for my work on BIG SCIENCE projects, is that I heard it used by managers who were trying to coerce coders to initiate scope creep: "What we're asking for isn't a big deal, it's just a small matter of programming". No coder I know has suggested to a manager that the manager write any code - That would be ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6AE5:2510:0:0:0:24 (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Simple matter of software was merged into the article Operator873^CONNECT 04:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simple matter of software is an article with multiple issues. Since "Simple matter of software" and "Small matter of software" are alternate formulations synonymous with "Simple matter of programming" and "Small matter of programming", any relevant content of Simple matter of software (e.g., Coles reference) should be merged into Small matter of programming, instead of fixing the tagged issues. IveGoneAway (talk) 21:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC) IveGoneAway (talk) 21:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.