Talk:Simultaneous localization and mapping/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) 01:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Thank you for submitting this article to Good Articles Nominations. After taking a quick glance through the article, I will have to quick fail this article based on WP:GAFAIL and the Good Article criteria. Specifically, this article has a lot of statements that are not referenced, making this far from reaching Criteria #2 Verifiable with no original research. The following is a detailed review of what is unreferenced:

Mathematical description

The entire section does not have any references.

Algorithms & subsections

Kinematics modeling, Loop closure, and Exploration: these subsections in this section do not have any references at all.
Mapping, Sensing, Audio-Visual SLAM: While some sentences are cited, there are a lot of sentences without references.
Algorithms, Acoustic Slam, Biological inspiration: while some of these sentences are cited, there are some sentences without references.

Implementations

While this is one sentence, no references are included in this section.

History

A little bit of this section is unreferenced.

Overall

Overall, I have three concerns in regards to verification:

1): The Kinematics modeling, Loop closure, and Exploration subsections of the Algorithms section do not have any references at all. Similarly, the entire Mathematical description and Implementations sections have no references.
2): Many sentences of the Mapping, Sensing, and Audio-Visual SLAM subsections have a loot of sentences without references.
3): Parts of the Algorithms (main paragraph), Acoustic Slam, Biological inspiration and History sections have sentences that require references.

I believe if these issues were corrected, this article would have a better chance if if was renominated again in the future. Please see Wikipedia:Good article criteria for what makes a Good Article, and especially Wikipedia:Verifiability for some tips in how to verify sentences. Also, I noticed that this nomination was your first edit. If you are a newer editor and have any questions, please feel free to leave a comment at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Thanks for submitting to Good Articles Nominations! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]