Talk:Simple Knowledge Organization System

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

(Things are different now) History too detailed?

The main content of the SKOS description was quite old, so I replaced it. But based on how old that material was, it would probably be helpful if someone validated every link in the document.

I also felt like the History was too detailed, but I didn't have enough insight to edit it down. See next comment which seems related.

--metaJohnG (talk) 22:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Too many details of work in progress?

It may be a bit problematic to include so many details of the work in progress because of Wikipedia:No original research but I'm not deeply enough involved in the English Wikipedia. I consider the Quick Guide to Publishing a Classification Scheme on the Semantic Web that I wrote not NPOV enough to include in the article. -- Nichtich 07:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you are too scrupulous. Concerning Wikipedia:No original research, all references given are public, so there is nothing original in the article body itself. And neutrality, well, a W3C working draft is what it is, but there again it's only a reference, nothing is included in the article body itself. I try to be as exhaustive as possible with references. universimmedia 12:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Batch of copyedits

Have just swept through quickly, making a number of very minor copy edits to make the article read a little better. Sometimes I rewrote phrases and ideas I didn't entirely understand as expressed, so feel free to revert or clarify further.

Well done to the contributors for filling it out to this point.

--Huge Bananas 01:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review and edits. As you certainly guessed, the original stuff was not written by a native english speaker. universimmedia 10:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing footnotes

If a footnote is outmoded, what is the update procedure?

24 SWOOP A Hypermedia-based Featherweight OWL Ontology Editor, developed by Mindswap - Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab Semantic Web Agents Project.

The SWOOP editor is now open source located here:

http://code.google.com/p/swoop/

--jwalling 02:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]