Jump to content

Talk:Signatures with efficient protocols

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

I missed the discussion about the deletion at the time. I certainly agree that the text can be improved but believe that it is an important concept for electronic privacy. Whether to call it CL-signature or Signature with efficient protocols is debatable. While the former is possibly more specific and more common, the latter is the name that Camenisch and Lysyanskaya chose themselves.

--Markulf (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]