Talk:Service Modeling Language

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Links/Resources

Cem's comment below is not dated, so it may or may not apply, but I hope the prediction for a re-write holds true. This article is certainly in need of work. The consortium has been inactive for half a year and the W3C has taken over vetting the spec delivered by the consortium. It appears that the work group is close to declaring a 'last call'. With the dormancy of the consortium, those interested in using SML would do well to reference the draft on the W3C site, not the old consortium site, serviceml.org. I will try to find time to do some work on this. The information on SML itself in the article is not egregiously wrong or distorted, but I doubt that anyone really familiar with the current state of SML would be entirely comfortable. I will try to put some work in as I find time, but I just stumbled onto this and can't do it justice now. --Vinemaple 08:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The part about models is not helping. This is just a general discussion and not specifically related to SML. Advseb 17:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to an article about SML. Im not going to write anything for it right now beacuse the information about it isnt substantial enough. See Here--Altrock78 10:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In a couple of weeks this should be streamlined and re-written. In the next weeks there will be some interesting new sources on this topic for sure. Until then this article is a stub resp. a collection of raw material. User:Cem Basman