Talk:Rotating radio transient

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The content of Rotating radio transients was merged into Rotating radio transient. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

A fact from Rotating radio transient appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that rotating radio transients are among the brightest astronomical sources of radio waves, yet are generally detectable for less than one second a day?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge from Rotating radio transients

Noticing a very old merge tag on the page (this revision; tagged since September), I merged the two. Rotating radio transients was largely a duplicate article, even citing one of the same sources. Fortunately, both are small enough so that merging consists of adding a source and changing one into a redirect. Ourai ^т _с 02:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should we list or tabulate some notable ones

Maybe none are notable (apart from RRAT J1819-1458) ? - Rod57 (talk) 08:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]