Talk:Quasi-harmonic approximation

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quasi-harmonic approximation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 8 September 2012 by reviewer Legoktm (talk · contribs).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing internal energy contribution

Dear all,

If I'm not wrong there is a missing T in U(T,V). The internal lattice energy is also T-dependent if one includes the internal energy of the harmonic oscillator (the internal energy of the harmonic oscillator is not only given by the zero point vibrations...U = (1/2 + <n>) \hbar \omega).

I would suggest to split the U(V) introduced in the article into a "static" lattice contribution $E_{\rm {lat}}(V)$ (i.e., the usual T=0 equation of state) PLUS the internal energy due to lattice vibrations: $U(T,V)=E_{\rm {lat}}(V)+U_{\rm {vib}}(T,V)$

The second term should read as

$U_{\rm {vib}}(T,V)=E_{\rm {ZP}}(V)+{\frac {1}{N}}\sum _{\mathbf {k} ,i}h\nu _{\mathbf {k} ,i}(V)\left[\exp \left(-{\frac {h\nu _{\mathbf {k} ,i}(V)}{k_{B}T}}\right)-1\right]^{-1}$

If one combines internal energy and entropy (F=U-TS), one arrives at the well known expression for the free energy

$F(T,V)=E_{\rm {lat}}(V)+E_{\rm {ZP}}(V)+k_{B}T{\frac {1}{N}}\sum _{\mathbf {k} ,i}\ln \left[1-\exp \left(-{\frac {h\nu _{\mathbf {k} ,i}(V)}{k_{B}T}}\right)\right],$ where the last term is sometimes mistakenly identified as the entropy due to lattice vibrations.

Unfortunately I do not have the book by Martin Dove (given as reference) at hand, so I can't say how its explicitly written there.

Best greets, Fritz Körmann — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.175.131.12 (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, the original way the article was written was wrong. I have edited it accordingly. JanJaeken (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]