Talk:Python (programming language)/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. This is certainly one of the better programming language GAs, but I do have a few minor observations:

External links should only appear in the External links section. So links like those in Programming philosophy and Alternative implementations should be converted to inline citations.

There a couple of clarification tags that need to be dealt with.

All citations should include full details, including title, publisher, and last access date.

The lead is a little on the short side to adequately summarise the article.

A nice piece of work nevertheless. --Malleus Fatuorum 15:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.