Talk:Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I am unsure of how to categorize this page, for the reason that i believe it to be heuristic, yet neuroheuristic more over, and there really is no category for this. I may have to create one later. I have also left things unfinished, such as footnotes or notation. I don't know how to do that yet, and will learn shortly. Wiki help pages said I can just toss the info on, and someone will come and fix it. As long as pages numbers and where i got it from are noted.

Zos 19:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not bad but umm, i dont think its appropriate to put this in neuroscience at all (pseudoscience if anything.) Is there a category for cognitive development? evolutionary psychology? new age/occult books? Also wouldn't this fall under the grounds of semiotics? And no, I haven't even read the book.

Oh also, theres a bit of a super geeky pun on the front page, "help improve the human biocomputer by expanding it"! (I love it!) Universal Logic (talk) 07:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's more Category:Philosophy of mind. And easier to categorize as a book. Since 'human biocomputer' is really only used by Lilly, it's impossible to properly source as a concept, so I've moved it to the book title. Skyerise (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]