Talk:Product structure modeling

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Industrial design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Product structure modeling. Favonian (talk) 17:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Product Structure Modeling → Product structure modelling –

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Matches the formatting of related article titles. $Tony (talk)$ 13:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Per WP:ENGVAR, there is no reason to change modeling to modelling. Some standardized rigour (talk) 07:41, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving to Product structure modeling per WP:CAPS and WP:ENGVAR (ghastly as it looks with only one l). Jenks24 (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.