Talk:Pole–zero plot

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

How bout Pole-zero plots in Continuous Time?

Mykeknauff 20:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

as Mykeknauff said, this page is somewhat misleading as it only deals with the discrete time case.

JMatopos (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

order of coefficients

Why is it $b_{0}+b_{1}s+b_{2}s^{2}$ ? Isn't it more usual to write $b_{0}s^{2}+b_{1}s+b_{2}$ ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.72.124 (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would $B(\beta _{m})=0$ be more clear than $B(s)|_{s=\beta _{m}}=0$ ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.72.124 (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should also write it in product of zeros/poles format, like $H(s)=k{\frac {\displaystyle \prod _{i=1}^{m}(s-z_{i})}{\displaystyle \prod _{i=1}^{n}(s-p_{i})}}$ but with consistent variable names and meanings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.60.72 (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]