Jump to content

Talk:Peter Norton Computing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

NC

Is there a good reason for Norton Commander to be the notable product? I would have thought that Norton Utilities would have been. It has been around longer, and I believe it had sold more copies while Peter Norton Computing still existed as an independent company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.246.58 (talkcontribs)

I personally strongly think that Norton Commander is a notable product too! It was a fairly decent, and maybe the only one, file manager back in the MS-DOS command line days, and it spun off many clones back then (Volkov Commander) and its legacy lived into a version for Windows, but then Windows Commander (now Total Commander) was on the rise (and it is pretty much popular nowadays), so I guess NC was abandoned. And of course Midnight Commander, the Linux NC-lookalike, has been inspired by NC, too! --Vlad|-> 17:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

So someone put a merge tag on the main article page, but didn't bother starting a discussion on it? That's reason enough to drop the suggestion. But OK, let's discuss now. I disagree, PN the person is separate fromo PNC, they just overlap. I fanything, PNC would be merged into Symantec. Dovid (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also disagree. Griffinofwales (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]