Talk:Perceptual robotics

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

refs

sorry for being subjective - I just have not found yet material from sources I am not linked to which of course would be welcome! Herdtien (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Moved to Perpetual robotics. Lynch 7 17:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perceptual Robotics → Perceptual robotics –

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term. Another article creator simply though we use title case. It's just a field of study. $Tony (talk)$ 06:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Not a proper noun and should be decapitalised accordingly. Jenks24 (talk) 10:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.