Jump to content

Talk:Parallel compression

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Merge

I don't agree with merging this, as it would be useful to have a full technical description on the page like the one that appears in one of the references that was removed by a previous edit. 203.144.32.165 03:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does parallell compression have any other effect, than reducing the ratio of the compressor used? 80.98.84.149 17:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parallel compression doesn't reduce the RATIO of the compressor used, for starters. What it does is keeps a similar ratio while minimally impacting the sound quality. Quite a fun little trick, that. Fun for mastering. And no, we shouldn't merge it. We need someone who really knows their stuff in this regard to expand this into a tutorial, since it is a useful tool not likely to soon become a unified device.

The question above was mine. What I was thinking about:

If we add the dry signal:

To a compressor that looks like this:

File:Parallel compression 2.png

Wouldn't we get a compressor that looks like this?

File:Parallel compression 3.png

MyNameHasBeenTaken 13:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parallel compression does not keep the same ratio - the combination of the direct path and the compressed path give generate a derived ratio (transfer characteristic) that is always less than that set on the compressor. I'd be willing to expand this article into something with a lot more detail.

203.97.220.175 (talk) 19:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]