Jump to content

Talk:Open source Unix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Separate page vs redirecting to Unix

There are many Unix variants - only some of them are open source. It's only since about 1998 that *any* open-source Unix variants have become interesting for the general computing public. If someone wants to link to open source Unix specifically, it's a good bet that they don't intend to talk about Unix in general. What's the argument in the other direction? --Alvestrand 20:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have created a useless stub, for a term that does not get used anywhere. First, there is only one actual UNIX which is open source, Solaris, the others are all Unix-like, partially POSIX compliant operating systems which lack enough components to get Unix certification. Second, the subject matter that could be contained here is already covered entirely in the Unix-like article. Your stub serves no purpose, you want the bottom section of the Unix-like article, which is why it was redirected there, this was already dealt with when someone wanted to make an article for Freenix. Janizary 19:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]