Talk:Object Windows Library

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Object Windows Library article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

C/C++ Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

OWL was not created by Borland

AFAIK, OWL was originally the framework that came with Actor, a language by the Whitewater Group. Borland only licensed it from them. I don't know about the licensing for later versions, i.e. if that was further developed by Borland, or also licensed from the Whitewater group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.39.173.69 (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borland licensed Actor from Whitewater to create OWL 1 for Pascal and C++. The C++ OWL 2 and later versions were a complete rewrite from scratch. This was done to really take advantage of C++ language features. (since in 1.0 the C++ and Pascal versions were the same design) Carlquinn (talk) 23:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten most of the article. It now does not claim anything about origins. However, note that the whole article now only concerns the C++ library that shipped with Borland C++. Feel free to add additional history and background. 86.14.168.5 (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OWLNext

Notability hasn't been shown. Half of the article mentions OWLNext, although it's actually I'd say a separate project which needs a separate article (if it does deserve) Half of the links provided don't work (some of them had pointed to the author's homepages); the author's name, Yuri, is Russian (or Ukrainian etc.), compare it to the grammar ("it allow", etc.), I think that section was written by Yuri himself (i.e. OWLNext's userbase is that limited). Note also: "Yura Bidus started an alternative to OWL/OWLNext called GUI Object Library." which has nothing to do with the subject of the article. Looks like self-advertisement. 77.40.47.17 (talk) 21:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

>> OWLNext probably does not deserve it's own page. It's distributed as a patch-set over the Borland's OWL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.90.2.142 (talk) 07:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed most of the old controversial content in section OWLNext. It now only briefly describes the OWLNext project. 86.14.168.5 (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

character-based OWL?

I seem to recall Borland had a library that allowed construction of GUI's using character graphics. I've seen this interface in a number of early 1990s packages. Does anyone recall if this was a version of OWL itself, or another product entirely? Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Different production, Turbo Vision. 88.159.65.111 (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]