Talk:Neosho-class monitor/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
surrendered might be a little WP:EGGy. Maybe "just over a month after Union forces captured the city after a two month long siege." or something like that (though that's a little wordy).
Done.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The last sentence in the short para in the service section, with "David Campbell 17 August 1873[5] for $13,600.[2]" - that looks rather ugly. Might you move the DANFS ref to the previous sentence and then replace the Gibbons ref with a footnote like "For the date and location of sale, see Neosho, DANFS; for the price, see Gibbons, p. 57."
Done.

One {{cn}} tag needs to be addressed.
Done.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Not too much to fix here, nice work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ping.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]