Talk:Name resolution (semantics and text extraction)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Split from the former all-in-one article

I've moved the content from a section in the 'Name resolution' page. Moving the comments too, but you might possibly want to see the old talk page. Aasasd (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Usama?

Do we have to use Usama bin Laden as an example? I think this is quite unappropriate. Maybe just use "John Smith", or if it has to be a well known name "Michael Jackson" (of which certainly multiple exist). Blonkm 12:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it was replaced with George Bush. Just slightly less controversial ;) —MattGiuca (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]