Talk:Mummification (BDSM technique)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the first article to come up when typing Mummification into the search field

That's completely ridiculous, sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.201.132 (talk) 23:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

bodyhose.com is a dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.136.160.65 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 15 January 2006

Sadly, I figured out that "the bottom" was a inside-term by the time I scanned the article to the bottom. It's not defined and everybody has one. Far too much restraint. See Cellular pathology for further inspiration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxEnt (talk • contribs) 02:16, 8 June 2006

I see weasel words here. ForestAngel 22:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, whoa, whoa. "Mummification" should lead to a page about the corpse preparation technique, anecdotally a topic that far more individuals are likely to be looking for. At most there should be a disambig page. People searching for "mummification" are fairly unlikely to be looking for this page. 162.83.200.70 20:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos in this article

Does anyone else find these girls absolutely gorgeous? Where do fetishists find these people? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.190.127 (talk) 08:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article problems

I pared the article down, but even what is left still needs sources, it just had less severe problems with WP:NOTAMANUAL, WP:EDITORIAL ("notice"), and Wikipedia:No original research. Please find Wikipedia:Reliable sources for this article and any statements you wish to add; information needs WP:Verification. Шизомби (talk) 13:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]