Talk:Monkey testing

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Requested move 22 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey test → Monkey testing – Since this article has been rewritten, it is appropriate to change the name from Monkey test, which is a noun specifying a kind of test, to Monkey testing, representing a testing technique. The new name also more accurately reflects the nature of the article. Aaroniidx (talk) 01:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 09:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support - The page name should reflect the page's content, which covers the technique. Meatsgains (talk) 03:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
oppose this is not about testing using monkeys, and even "monkey test" should not be used. Both of those should redirect to animal testing on non-human primates where real live monkeys are used in tests for monkey testing -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 06:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if moved it should be monkey testing (computing); if not, it should move to monkey test (computing) -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 06:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - "Monkey testing" is used in cited sources. Thanks for the rewrite. ~Kvng (talk) 13:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support It should definitely be "testing" instead of "test". Whether this should be disambiguated from Animal testing on non-human primates by a disambiguation page instead of a hatnote, is a separate question, which should be handled in a separate move request. —Ruud 14:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

If the content is being merged to the fuzz testing article, why are we discussing this? Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I suggest participants in this discussion weigh in on the merge discussion. ~Kvng (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.