Talk:Mapping class group of a surface

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The page is in an unsatisfying state as I left it, some sections are stubs (for example those on cohomology, general subgroups and the historical introduction---they do not necessarily need to be much longer but they could stand to be more synthetic and comprehensive) and the article lacks a short discussion of the non-orientable case.

One thing I am not much satisfied with is the lack of a section on the large scale geometry of the group. In particular, a substantiation of the heuristic that the MCG behaves in some ways like an hyperbolic group and in others like a higher-rank lattice would be nice: some are scattered around the current page but having a synthetic, short exposition of this would be much better. I am not unfortunately not aware of any wide-ranging book or survey about it.

Links to relevant algebro-geometric topics would also be welcome. jraimbau (talk) 16:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Birman exact sequence

I tried to make what I thought was an improvement to the section on the Birman exact sequence. To get it right, my reference is these lecture notes by (Dylan) Thurston. I don’t know how to make that into a decent Wiki link. Unfortunately, that reference only covers $\chi (S)<0$ , and I’m definitely confused about something when $S=S^{2}$ . I’m working on it. In the meantime, I’ve reverted by own revisions. Adam1729 (talk) 22:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory passage

This passage appears in the article:

"This action thus gives a linear representation $\mathrm {Mod} (S)\to \mathrm {GL} _{2g}(\mathbb {Z} )$ ."

This map is in fact a surjection with image equal to the integer points $\mathrm {Sp} _{2g}(\mathbb {Z} )$ of the symplectic group."

Of course the map is a surjection onto its image. But the map referred to in "This map is in fact a surjection" is in fact not a surjection (for g ≥ 2), because its codomain is $\mathrm {GL} _{2g}(\mathbb {Z} )$ (and not $\mathrm {Sp} _{2g}(\mathbb {Z} )$ ).47.44.96.195 (talk) 22:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this was indeed carelessly written (maybe by me), please edit to give it the correct meaning. jraimbau (talk) 11:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]