Talk:Inferential role semantics

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Philosophy: Language Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of language

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Article merged: See old talk-page here —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrideOfKripkenstein (talk • contribs) 04:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment

I don't think the linked paper by Ned Block is a defense of CRS, in fact quite the opposite. The paper should be reviewed to ensure he is actually a proponent of the position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.30.189.33 (talk • contribs)

It is difficult to tell because the paper lacks a complete bibliography. However, if we assume that when Ned Block is referring to himself when he uses the name "Block", then the first paragraph would seem to be a dead giveaway. In any case, the linked article has not been framed in any way at all in this stub, which makes the inquiry moot { Ben S. Nelson } 03:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]