Talk:Imaging particle analysis

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 2 January 2014 by reviewer Gryllida (talk · contribs).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with Micro-flow imaging

It looks to me as these are one and the same thing, but an expert opinion would be appreciated. Derek Andrews (talk) 19:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: proposed merge with Micro-flow imaging: Micro-flow imaging (MFI) is a trademarked name for a brand of dynamic imaging particle analysis system. Since it is a vendor-specific trademarked name for a product, I do not believe it should be merged into this general category. Rather, that article should reference this page as an example of this type of system Fsixtyfour 14:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fsixtyfour (talk • contribs)

Support merge. Calling something by another name doesn't mean that it needs to have a separate page - it could easily be accommodated on the same page as Imaging particle analysis. Even if it is a trademarked name (do we have evidence for this?), a trademark alone does not make it independently notable. The Sharma et al. (2010) paper doesn't refer to MFI as a trademarked term. Klbrain (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Understood. However, I still do not believe it (Micro-flow imaging) should have a separate section, as it is just a vendor's version of Imaging particle analysis#Dynamic_imaging_particle_analysis. And it is trademarked: see this link. They were first to market and did a great job of making their name be used as a term for the "technology in general" (hence all the journal references), but it really is similar to as "Xerox®" is to "photocopy". There are several other "dynamic imaging particle analysis" vendors whose products are used "in the biopharmaceutical industry to characterize subvisible particles from approximately 1 μm to >50 μm" Fsixtyfour (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]