Jump to content

Talk:IBM Systems Application Architecture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

New Standards

I was at GUIDE (note that there should be a page for Guide separate from Share) the day SAA was announced. As I recall, SAA did define new standards, including a new standard for an operating system and OS/2 is an implementation of the operating system. I need to find material to support this and I hope to do that. Sam Tomato (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great. GUIDE has sort of gone off the radar generally since they disbanded -- It would be nice to get anything from there.
Apparently there now is.Sam Tomato (talk) 01:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the article says "OS/2 Presentation Manager was a full implementation of the SAA presentation interface" but OS/2 did not exist prior to the announcement of SAA. When SAA was first announced, OS/2 was also announced as an operating system to be developed. Microsoft assisted in the development of OS/2 prior to developing Windows NT. Sam Tomato (talk) 01:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SAA an alternative meaning

At an SAA seminar, a speaker said that internally they called SAA Scratching Akers Ass. This could indicate that John Akers was somehow involved with SAA, I think. --FredTC (talk) 13:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. It is typical for people to criticize things they don't understand. Sam Tomato (talk) 04:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Universal Windows Platform

The "Common user access" section says "A user who sits down at a PC should see the same menus, keyboards and procedures that he would at a 3270 terminal." except now the devices are PCs, tablets, phones and such. Sam Tomato (talk) 04:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]