Talk:hqx (algorithm)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer graphics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

The external link for HQnX are suspended. Link are dead, for now.... --KymyA (talk) 07:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a beautiful algorithm: the combination of precalculated optimisation and fast lookup on render is very elegant, and the results are stunning. -- Gigacephalus (talk) 17:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the reference to https://code.google.com/archive/p/hqx as I moved this project to github. Also note this was not the original project, it was a port of Maxim Stepin code to use DevIL for image loading/saving and to more modern C. I did this cause his site was dead and it was hard to get copies of his code. It is such a great algorithm I had to preserve it. Besides switching to DevIL and adding a command line interface it pretty much as it was originally. Grom358 (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC) '[reply]