Talk:Gaussian process emulator

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Wonder if this will survive? I don't know anything about it just had it mentioned as an alternate technique to a neural net and random forests. crandles (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect elsewhere?

Perhaps this should just be redirected elsewhere perhaps to Bayes estimator?

Maybe the following could help: "the Bayesian emulator ideas introduced by Kennedy and O'Hagan, now being developed in the climate context by Jonty Rougier and people at the Hadley Centre. I think this is probably what "Gaussian process emulators" refers to in your paragraph."

I have provided a link in the article to Anthony O'Hagan, Marc C. Kennedy and Jeremy E. Oakley paper.

crandles (talk) 11:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded this somewhat, at least providing a better meaning and context. However, it is not obvious how much about applications should be put here rather than in a more general article about statistical analysis of computer experiments. I don't think that just adding to computer experiment would be suitable. There seems enough special context here to make it good to have this separate from Bayes estimator. Melcombe (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]