Jump to content

Talk:Fulkerson–Chen–Anstee theorem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Berger 2014

"Berger [4] reinvented this result and gives a direct proof." I've just checked the cited paper and it does not look like a direct proof to move. It proves a more general statement, but only using the Fulkerson–Chen–Anstee theorem. I'm also not sure what "reinvented" is supposed to mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.99.67.178 (talk) 19:14, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]