Talk:Fibonacci sequence/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 14:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this one.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The external link tool to the right reveals one dead link that needs to be addressed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation link tool to the right reveals 4 issues to be addressed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LEAD

You do not introduce On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences before presenting its acronym. Please help the uninformed reader with a format Full name (Abbreviation).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
By definition...0 and 1... (I hope you later explain why it does not start with 1 and 2).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Should "either with F0 = 0 or with F1 = 1" be "either with F1 = 0 or with F1 = 1" or "either with F0 = 0 or with F0 = 1"?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is there an appropriate infobox for sequences?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Origins

"saying that the cases for m beats (Fm+1) is obtained by adding a [S] to Fm cases and [L] to the Fm−1 cases" Makes little sense to me.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Revise each line of the first, second, third and fourth month to say how many rabbits and thus how many pairs. It gets confusing and I think some of your explaintions make it more so.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Fibonacci numbers

Whereas there seems to be a useful relationship with the bunnies justifying considering Fibonacci numbers, you present no reason for the relevance of the negafibonaccis.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Occurrences in mathematics

Most of this section is unsourced, leaving the reader to question the veracity of the claim and to wonder if these were selected from a much larger list of examples.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to FAIL this article. There are too many subsections that are entirely unsourced. I am so far removed from my Masters in Stats that I keep looking for references that are not there. Any reader who wants to read this article will be at a loss to WP:V many important elements of the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is so filled with jargon, I can barely read it. 66.87.67.72 (talk) 03:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]