Talk:Feigenbaum test

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Philosophy: Mind Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind

Feigenbaum article

I don't have access to this article

E.A. Feigenbaum (2003) "Some Challenges and Grand Challenges for Computational Intelligence" doi:10.1145/602382.602400

but according to [1] it describes a subject matter reasoning test. Perhaps it precedes Kurzweil? If so, then it is perhaps a good source for a definition for this article. Pgr94 (talk) 07:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose move to Feigenbaum test

The term "Feigenbaum test" seems to have become more common than the current title "Subject-matter expert Turing test" in the existing sources. See Google Books search results:

15:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) " Daask (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]