Jump to content

Talk:Dual code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Types of self-dual codes

Unless I am very much mistaken, self-dual codes of arbitrary characteristic exist (take any symmetric matrix, and prepend an identity matrix). I added the qualification, from Conway and Sloane's text, that every codeword's weight is a multiple of some constant. Wandrer2 (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of inner product

I am rather unhappy with the definition on this page. There are two notions of duality for codes over finite fields

(i) duality with respect to the standard symmetric dot product x_1 y_1 + ... + x_n y_n

(ii) duality with respect to the standard sesquilinear dot product x_1 y_1^* + ... + x_n y_n^*

where y |-> y^* represents the order two automorphism of the finite field.

Type (ii) is only relevant when the order of the field is a square.

The proposed definition reduces to (i) when q = p and to (ii) when q = p^2. Otherwise the dual proposed here isn't of a standard type and moreover the double dual of a code won't in general be equal to the original code.

I may try to clarify this on the page itself.

RJChapman (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there's no warrant for the definition given here in any standard source and it makes double dual come out wrong. I'll change it if there's no further objection. Richard Pinch (talk) 11:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dual code vs Dual space?

Do dual codes have anything to do with dual space? --Culix (talk) 23:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed, given the points made above, the binary vector space is made into its own dual by use of the inner product. Richard Pinch (talk) 11:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]