Talk:Double superscript notation

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This page should not be a REDIRECT, because it is neither a misspelling, nor a synonym. If people are taken to "double subscript notation" when they think they want "double superscript notation", they will be confused. Fresheneesz 09:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean - however, if we made it clear on the Double Subscript Notation page that Double Superscript Notation is actually called Double Subscript Notation, would that not clarify matters? Or have I misunderstood? Kel-nage 17:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would clarify things, but I think that it would put unnecessary clutter on the double subscript page. I mean, how many people really make that mistake (just my stupidty, and.. yours?). Fresheneesz 19:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, no, I found the page by clicking "Random article" plenty of times (it's how I do Wiki, I randomly search until I find pages that need improving). If it's so unlikely people will make the mistake, surely it can just be a redirect? Kel-nage 17:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]