Talk:Distributed transaction

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computer science

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

I feel that this article is a little difficult to read. I'm sure this could be simplified to make it less arcane. From a personal viewpoint, I've got two Master's degrees in Electronic Engineering and Industrial Computing and I struggled to get through the language used here. --Gantlord 13:10, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. All I wanted was a simple explanation, yet the language used here is way above the average person's understanding. Something a little more basic would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.54.206.90 (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about mentioning CAP theorem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.150.132.94 (talk) 12:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coming from someone who works with distributed, transactional systems, I didn't find this difficult to read at all. Maybe it is arcane, and above the average reader, but that's because it is rather arcane topic by nature. I think this article would most benefit from some details about why distributed transactions are a problem (their history, the challenges they impose) and some more related materials such as the "two-general's problem" and what strategies (beyond and deeper then two-phase commit) have been implemented to deal with these problems. By the way, Microsoft's distributed transaction manager is called MS DTC (Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boojiggly (talk • contribs) 03:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commitment ordering

The neutrality of part of this page is disputed, as part of a wider discussion. See Talk:Commitment ordering and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science#User:Comps / Commitment ordering. —Ruud 14:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of distributed consensus like paxos ?

To my (limited) knowledge a way to implement distributed transaction is the use of the Paxos and Paxos-like algorithms. Shouldn't it be mentioned here ? --MindTailor (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]