Talk:Design review based on failure mode

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

It would be good to add a section discussing the interrelationship between DRBFM and FMEA. 103.4.124.12 (talk) 00:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to DFMEA?

I've placed a tag proposing a merger, as this particular Quality tool is closely related to the concept, and may not be WP:N to merit its own article. Thoughts? Boogerpatrol (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DRBFM should not be merged with FMEA. DRBFM now has it own SAE J2886 DRBFM Recommended Practice published and AIAG will be publishing a DRBFM Reference document in April of 2014. Companies that use DRBFM do not view DRBFM the same as DFMEA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:4:1B00:1B7:8CC2:B512:58F4:1DF6 (talk) 14:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both, DFMEA and DRBFM are tools for risk analysis. Nevertheless, they are individual methods on their own, that only have a few overlappings in the approach. Therefore, a merge of FMEA and DRBFM articles should not be done.Wernernico (talk) 12:20, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]