Jump to content

Talk:Criss-cross algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Old nomination: Inaccessible

I nominated the following hook:  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 00:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds a bit difficult for a DYK, don't you think? I mean, is there any way it could be worded to be more accessible? CRGreathouse (t | c) 04:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In particular, I don't think many readers—even mathematically sophisticated ones—will know of the Klee–Minty cube, nor the significance of a vector space's dimension. If I were writing it (and I'm not!) I might say something about the fact that it's an exponential-time algorithm that performs far better in practice. Surely there are other things that educated but nonspecialist readers could appreciate? CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's helpful. At least the phrase "Klee-Minty" should go!
Caveat: I have not yet provided a reference to the expected behavior of the criss cross algorithm (which is D on cubes of dimension D, I believe). The expected number of steps of the simplex algorithm is also linear under a wide class of models (which are incompatible with reality, alas); the expected running time is usually thought to be about 3D on practical problems.
I simplified it a bit.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 19:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Maybe this would work better?
If you like this, then I should find a reference. Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 20:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I added some preliminary referencing about average behavior. The expected behavior of the simplex method (on problems from the unit sphere) is O(D) by Borgwardt and Smale. I don't have Klee & Minty's paper handy, but it seems trivial that a cube drawn from the sphere should have D steps on average. (I don't have time to reference properly today: Iterating the bibliography operator initialized with Fukuda & Terlaky should suffice. Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 20:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated the alternative. Thanks for the suggestions.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 21:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. CRGreathouse (t | c) 23:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I submitted it, along with a graphic. Please consider vetting it at DYK. Thanks again for your feedback. (I evaluated the D and 2D expressions with D=3, computing 3 and 8 respectively: I trust this does not violate Original Research policy!) Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 00:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: The article was viewed 4536 times in 201104.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 00:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Example or Illustration needed

The article needs an example, preferably with an illustration, to move up to "B class".  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]