The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2 November 2024. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citingyour sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles
2004 comment
This article's examples only confuse me... I understand some of the fallacies that are 'correlative based,' but I do not understand the examples given here, or the underlying theme that makes them all correlative based. It needs a better example and explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.127.205.57 (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2004 (UTC)[reply]
merge?
Is there any reason these various types of correlative fallacies aren't merged? Would anybody mind if I did so? -Eleusinian 06:11, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
