Talk:Continuous performance task

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Synonymous to Continuous Performance Test?

If so, when redirect could be made, and CPT-IP (Identical Pairs version) description could be added to the article. Best regards, CopperKettle 11:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify

The examples make no sense to this layperson. Please explain them in a bit more detail -- I'm not sure what they're supposed to signify.75.139.32.246 21:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page is basically incorrect, I will add some information but if anyone wants to expand on it, you may use the links that I provide to do so. 70.111.78.169 (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Acrisolo[reply]

Incredible work. I have just tried to wikify it a bit (internal links, proper style for references, etc...) --Garrondo (talk) 09:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Thank you for the wikification! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.231.184.118 (talk) 16:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

This article is not about a continuous performance task, but about the Continuous Performance Test. Therefore I propose a move to Continuous Performance Test. Please comment! Lova Falk talk 09:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment! Lova Falk talk 12:20, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree This article looks pretty generic to me. If you want to make a new page about a specific product, it should probably have "Connors", "IVA", or such in the title, to show whose CPT it is. --IanOsgood (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I won't do it. Lova Falk talk 09:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done

I see Lova proposed a move earlier

Looking at this article talk page, I see that there has been confusion about what this article is about, so I will fix that and prepare for more fixes in the future. I will rename as that has already been proposed and discussed here before. The sources make clear what to do. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 19:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other CPT tests

Why don't you mention tests such as the Bourdon-Wiersma test, the Boudon-Vos test and Hogrefe's d2-tets? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad van der Ven (talk • contribs) 12:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical Validity

Is it appropriate to add a Clinical Validity section that covers research about the reliability of the test for ADD diagnosis? See ^[1] and ^[2]

75.86.40.19 (talk) 03:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] ttps://www.additudemag.com/cpt-not-accurate-adhd-assessment-for-adults-study/

[2] ttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30654686/

[1]

[2]