Jump to content

Talk:Compulsory Basic Training

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

November 2006

The concept Compulsory Basic Training is not specific to motorbike training. I suggest this topic is expanded or renamed at lease to reflect the motorbike nature.61.9.212.224 06:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Dean[reply]


Begin Motorcycling.co.uk

I have added this very informative free reference site, please feel free to discuss if you think it was a bad move195.171.111.194 11:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category A2 (not A1) Practical Test Pass (Not Direct/Accelerated Access)

Hello,

Is anyone aware of what Information Code is used by the DVLA on a Full Driving Licence to show that the licence holder's Category A licence is restricted to Motorcycles up to 25kW(33bhp) and a power to weight ratio not exceeding 0.16kW/kg or a Motorcycle combination with a power to weight ratio not exceeding 0.16kW/kg for 2 years?

(Example: Passing a Practical Test in a vehicle with automatic transmission will result in an Information Code "78" being denoterd in the Code section of the Full Driving Licence) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rplyons (talkcontribs) 13:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibook Project: Open-version highway code

As a sub-project of mine, as another hobby I would like to ask if any others who have passed their CBT, Direct Access and Driving licenses if they would like to contribute towards a pinpoint-accurate-referenced version of the highway code, and perhaps if popular enough open replacements for driving test related books for other countries. Of course, I will be e-mailing the DSA and others to see if anyone there would be willing to review the book for legal accuracy before it is considered a "complete" project. For anyone that is interested, please leave comments below rather than on my talk page. J O R D A N [talk ] 02:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Is the 1990 date correct?

The first para implies that the CBT was introduced in 1990.

I remember doing the (my) CBT in the mid 80's, if I remember correctly it was about 83-84. It was part 1 of the 2 part test for motorcycles over 50cc and under 125cc. It lasted the same 2 years.

Hey, does this mean I can knock 10 yrs off my age with complete honesty! : ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thru-a-hoop (talkcontribs) 10:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, sadly not. Nowdays in most cases you have to do CBT before you can ride a bike on the road, meaning that most new bikes end up being delivered to test centres so that their new owners can wobble around a playground for a bit before venturing out onto the road.
The old two part bike test simply split the original bike test into two bits; your provisional license was valid for 2 years, during which time you had to complete both parts (part 1 involved wobbling around playgrounds and knocking cones over, whereas part 2 was the traditional bike test with the examiner standing by the side of the road with a clipboard.) The main aim of the 2 part test was to prevent people riding around for decades on a provisional license - you could, however, ride around for two years without receiving any training before your provisional license expired. Paul-b4 (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Paul B4, I understand the distinction now. When I did the 'cone squashing thing', it was a '2 part test'. This article is about Compulsory Basic Training, which although the 1st part of the old test and CBT are similar in the 'cone squashing' bit, they are different.
I was just raising a query of when was the CBT was introduced. Thru-a-hoop (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Open Government Licence

Text from www.direct.gov.uk is covered by Open Government Licence and can be copied and reproduced. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/

This post and the edits have been made by the Driving Standards Agency who wrote the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.98.96 (talk) 20:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:Copy-paste and WP:NOTHOWTO. Wikipedia is not a how-to on getting your license, or a how to on any subject. And copy-pastes of text from elsewhere are almost always unacceptable, even when the license is not an issue. Copy-pasting instructions from other web sites does not improve encyclopedia articles. Finally, the open government license is not the same as WP:CC-BY-SA. Please stop. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]