Talk:Comparison of packet analyzers

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computing: Networking / Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

More feature comparison tables

This article is unfortunately no more than a list of packet analysers. I'd love to see feature support tables. Some important features IMHO include:

Process grouping
Protocol grouping (HTTP, TCP, RTSP etc.)
Support for popular protocols (e.g. understanding HTTP POST syntax and decoding them)

C xong (talk) 06:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]