Talk:Common integrals in quantum field theory

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

"Feynman's famous formula"

So what happened with `Feynman's famous formula'? (See Witten et. al., Quantum fields and strings: A course for mathematicians, Volume 1, page 427, Proposition 1.3.) 140.180.10.63 (talk) 08:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined variable

Can someone define the symbol "alpha" in section "Integrals with differential operators in the argument"? 160.39.34.120 (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Modified Coulomb potential with mass -- "erroneous correction"?

Over a decade ago, I corrected what appeared to be an error -- a typo, perhaps. Specifically, I changed g(mr) --> 0 to g(mr) --> 1.

I just went over my history of "contributions" and edit differences. It appears that zero is correct after all -- although I could be blundering now instead of ten years ago. It appears to refer to the expression in braces:

$1+{\frac {2}{mr}}+{\frac {2}{(mr^{2})}}\left(e^{mr}-1\right)$

Unless I'm blundering now, that term really does approach zero. It also appears that my "correction" has continued to propagate down to now. Could someone please check this? Wherever I blundered, I sincerely apologize.Johnm307 (talk) 05:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]